This is a summary blog post, to be used as a guideline for past and future posts.
Now is always an option for a new beginning. But now can be easier than later, from a certain point of view. Shifts in direction of outcome are easier at certain “now” periods of our timeline. With everything going today, Now is absolutely such a time. We’ve never had a Now quite like this in any of our lives, young, old – this chaos is new for all of us! We can create order out of chaos, as one of the secretive groups rumored to be steering our world says, quite appropriately. But do we want to let such secretive groups choose and steer how our new order is estabished? Or do we collectively, all of humanity, want to take over the steering wheel and and drive open, public conversations and agreements about how we steer ourselves going forward?
This is one option we have presented to us today: the choice to bring formerly hidden things into the collective, open human consciousness. We do not need all of us to agree to such a vision, but we do need some of us steering/rowing in the same direction. This absolutely does not mean we all agree on everything. That is a fallacy that would serve us well to leave behind: that any one meta-solution or one-meta way of doing things is necessary, or even that one group or tribe or organization has the one answer. This is a major problem for humanity, when we reduce the way life on Earth operates down to manageable levels; there is no one way, no one answer, no one person, no one group who can do everything, control everything, know everything, and, therefore, steer everything. Top-down control of such a dynamic, living system is not only impossible, it’s unhealthy and unsustainable.
With the current world events, the work I’ve been struggling through over the last 18 months now comes into a new focus. I think I can offer some assistance to my fellow humans, should you choose to listen and enact these things I am going to start laying out more clearly. It’s time, and I’m ready to do my part.
What follows is an overview that can help you understand and follow what the hell I’m even talking about, in past blogs and comments, and in the forthcoming wave of posts that I have – over 400 pages of information and adding nearly every night. Some of this is so simple it’ll make you do the proverbial face-palm, and some is so complex it is a serious stretch of our language and my brain to try to explain it in a way that makes any sense. To deal with AKL is to work in an entirely different language and point of view.
If you find spiritual stuff too woo-woo, then please just give me the benefit of the doubt. Atheists and true believers and everyone in-between can get on board and help do this work. On one level we’re simply talking about a new-ish way of looking at things and going about our lives. But small changes at the individual level scale up to a global tsunami of change. Don’t let the big picture distract you and send you down rabbit holes – keep your eye on the ball and keep your focus on the individual level of what you personally are doing and can do. This will help keep the immensity of what we’re doing and up against in perspective. Keep it local, keep it personal. This scales.
If you are like me and you want to see some positive changes come out of this current chaos, then we need to take the opportunity presented in the now and start doing some things differently, together. We do not need to all agree on the how, we only need to agree somewhat on the baseline reality that we live in. This works whether or not you are interested in the supercharged level of AKL manifestation that I can help you with, if you want. Or it works from the most commonly understand 3D level of reality that we’re all mostly familiar and comfortable with. Please don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater if some of the things I discuss here are weird or strange or unbelievable.
Your belief is not required for me to help, but your agreement as to our baseline situation is helpful. But also that is not required. There are no rules here, in this new world, no commandments, no laws, no fences, gates, walls, or anything that can hold us in. There are only agreements as to how we look at this world we find ourselves in, and I think, if you just walk with me a bit here, I can help show you what I’m talking about, I can help show you that, yes, we can actually all agree on some things. We don’t need to agree on much, just a few core things and then we can effect whatever kind of change we choose to.
If you want a healthy, stable world for all of us to live in, then please hear me out. I have some helpful pointers that can help start us in a healthy direction. I do not claim to be able to answer all questions, or even much of any questions. I, of course, have opinions and they are very subjective, so take everything I say for what it is – just one person’s perspective. This is absolutely not about me. This is about you, and about us. I make no claims to be anything other than what I am telling you, so please trust only yourself. I only offer commentary and ideas, not firm truths or claims of being “right”. Personal due diligence is appropriate and important. Trust in self before you trust in anyone else. Anyone who tells you they have one answer or the answer, verify, verify, verify. Everyone has an agenda. If you don’t understand their agenda, put them in the suspect category, me included… Me especially!
Some random snippets I think will help get this ball rolling and help explain how I think I can be helpful to my fellow humans moving forward.
Human = 1
Human = 1 is THE PRIME agreement I feel we need to start and this will never change for me. This is our primary foundation to everything We do. If all things can and should be on the table, then all things can and should be taken apart before we put them back together. The value of each human, then, can be reduced to this equation. If someone cannot either agree to or even consider this to be a real foundational thing for humanity, that person should not be trusted with finger paints, let alone be allowed to have any kind of say in how Humanity deals with our collective issues necessary to stabilize ourselves.
This means equality of value of every single human being, as opposed to, for example, the idea George Orwell wrote about in Animal Farm: Some Animals are more equal than others. Meaning some humans are more valuable than others. This is a highly dangerous slippery-slope belief that can keep us on this very dark, tumultuous history we’ve lived in up to Now. Don’t get wrapped around the axle on this one, trying to slice and dice different ways to measure a human – you’ll go way down a rabbit hole that you can get lost in. Just hold the idea loosely, and in general: each human has a value of 1. Each Human has a life-value of 1, to state it another way.
Not following this ideal is one of the big problems facing us today, IMO. The rulers of our world, both the official ones and the self-appointed ones, whoever they are and however they came to be in these positions of power don’t really matter. But a belief in the superiority of one type of human over another is what’s gotten us in this predicament we find ourselves in. If you are going to believe some humans are greater than 1, Me > 1 in other words, the logical end point of that equation is slavery at best and genocide at worst, so functionally somewhere between those two extremes.
Ideas and Terms
This is a general list of things I’m working on and things I’ve come to understand that will help understand how I do what I do and how others might follow on this path or create a similar path – whatever one chooses. General direction is what’s important, NOT absolute answers. Keep this in mind.
Akashic Level. Akashic Records is a term used by some to name the outside-of-our-3D-reality record of the Universe to include all human activity, history, thoughts, and each of our individual lives. Think of it as the galactic version of the Internet. I’ve modified this term and use it to mean “All that is in existence that we don’t normally see, feel, or even have an awareness of”. All things outside of our 3D existence, in other words. If the woo-woo troubles you, just ignore me when I talk about AKL. I find it helpful, but not functionally necessary to do the work.
Our physical reality, as we understand it today.
Meatsuit is a term I picked up from another writer. The physical manifestation of the 3D – our physical bodies, in other words. It’s kind of a cheeky term so I find it useful and humorous.
Biases and Perspectives
Biases in perspectives and perception cause confusion in understating, at all levels of our reality. Even the physical perspective on our planet of what is “up”. Our “up-down” perspective of our planet, for example, gives us a biased view of the galaxy, of the Universe even. What is up? In an X, Y, Z 3D universe, all axial-perspectives are equally balanced. To bias a perspective, to “weight” one axis over the other stats with an imbalance that one of the prime axis is better than the others. This creates and imbalance of perspective. Imbalance does not scale. For example, the Northern Hemisphere is top, up, on top – everyone knows this, right? Antarctica is down and the North Pole is up, right? No! The planet just is. We can probably make the argument, based on the plane of the elliptic, that up and down are at least the prime two “directions” we can use to orient, but who’s to say which is which? Flip it 180 degrees and nothing has changed, only perspective. Even when we think we have a perspective that “works”, it’s still a duality in two directions of one prime axis.
Perspective matters. Solutions without multiple perspectives do not scale and are doomed to fail. It’s the solution equivalent of pin the tail on the donkey. You might get lucky, but chances are high you will fail. If your perspective can easily be described as an –ism, then you have a biased and limited perspective. This goes for politics, religion, spirituality, and everything in-between.
This one can be difficult to wrap one’s mind around, and it requires a certain looseness of mind to hold, but it’s possible. The Tao Te Ching is, as far as I know, the best study of duality. If you can understand The Tao, you’re well on your way to being able to hold two apparently competing ideas at once. This is an important attribute when sifting through data and perspectives and testing ideas. Two is always better than one, and more than two is even better, if you can get that many balls in your mind at once.
F Scott Fitzgerald says “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”
System Dynamics & the Complexity of our 3D World
System Dynamics means one thing for business and industry, but I think it works well for overall 3D life. We are a very complex meta-system of subsystems within subsystems. Of fractals within fractals, or bubbles within bubbles are other ways to state this same thing.
Hierarchical systems assume one prime view or one prime system is possible. This is, more or less, the Mechanical or Mechanistic view of 3D: Life is a machine that can be broken down and understood by its parts and then put back together again. It has one meta-system that can be understood and controlled from the top.
This point of view dominates modern society and is possibly the primary source of our suffering and imbalance. Once a system becomes overly complex and self-supporting, removing or weakening any one part can bring the whole system down. Think of our physical bodies for scale here as a scalable idea of a complex system that can’t be reduced any further.
I propose that our human society has not always been a single complex system, but it is now. You can’t operate on the patient by removal or complete upheaval of subsystems without killing the host, without taking down the whole system. Furthermore, I propose that this very complex single system we’re in now cannot be fully understood nor controlled from a single point of control model – the pyramid model that we all know. Any small group of people cannot possibly control a system this dynamic. Why does “big C” Communism fail on a large scale, again and again? A complex system with a single chokepoint of control at top. This is not a viable solution, it does not scale, and it will therefore always fail. As an analogy, how long could you stay alive if all of the functions of your body were consciously controlled by your brain? Forget to breathe for a few minutes, forget to keep your heart beating, forget to take out the garbage for too long… And you’ll quickly die.
This means the current push for more and more centralization is killing us, absolutely and without doubt. We can remove all the conspiracy, all those trying to do good, all those trying to do bad – all of them. Throw them all out. Anyone who says we can centralize ourselves out of these problems will kill us all. At best, it’s the worst kind of hubris. At worst, it’s purposeful deception in order to kill our species, and everything in-between, of course.
This is probably the biggest hurdle that I see. The powers that be have been consolidating and consolidating over many generations, and they are within grasp of locking down full control. Children want a strong parent. Adults want to be left alone to live their lives. Do you want a parent, or do you want peer adults where we can work together on things?
We’re talking loosening up the structures of control, backing off the laws, rules, and regulations – as it makes sense to, don’t be silly and claim we’re talking anarchy here! All things must balance. That which does not balance is not sustainable. Smaller systems are easier to monitor and adjust quickly. Balance is achieved not by top-down control, but by grass-roots balance of all our subsystems. If too much control breaks it, then you’re not working far enough down the fractal. Take it apart and try again.
We’re seeing the complete and utter failure of top-down systems today. We cannot pivot and adjust because of too much control at the top. DO NOT let anyone tell you more control and more centralization are needed to “fix” things.
Project Stabilize Humanity. Before we do anything else we need to stabilize. When you’re on a frozen lake and the ice starts cracking, you lay flat and stay still. Hold in place, evaluate, and then, carefully, slowly, we can do things. What those things are I have no idea. I only see the immediate paths we have before us. To do better, we must stabilize. We can do it now, with pain and effort yes of course, but we can do it now. If we don’t take this opportunity to stabilize now, we put that much more at risk going forward. If the path we choose is not PSH and stability, we might not get another chance.
For me, a central sub-project of PSH is what I call the soft landing. I don’t want to see a hard change that puts us into too much chaos. Today we have the opportunity to take what the Corona Pandemic is giving us – yes, this is a gift, if we make it such. We can make it a gift by creating a future where today was the gift that created tomorrow’s stability.
Fear of loss creates loss. Fear is a self-sustaining emotion. Those using fear to control are harnessing an unsustainable, unbalanced system. It does not scale, so it will eventually fall. If we allow fear to control us, we will have a hard landing or no landing at all.
Time, Timelines, and Time-lives
This is a newish thing, for me, I’ve been working with. Those of you not into the woo-woo might want to stop reading now!
Time is malleable. Timelines are also, therefore, malleable. Multiple past possibilities lead to, effectively and far as we understand, a singular “now”. Time-lives are the different “me” past timeline possibilities-probabilities. Now is just now. From this Now, I can grab or promote, choose if you will, settle on one – or even more than one pasts. This is where what the Q group says makes sense to me: Future proves the past.
So future probabilities based on Now can then, change or be changed in the Now. It’s kind of a different way to think about “today’s decisions impact tomorrow”. This is where I do my manifestation work. I cast backwards into my past timeline – timelife and also cast forward, to a generalized “direction” in the future where we’ve gone a ways into PSH with the soft landing. I don’t need a solid, complete vision of the future, I just need to know which general “direction” to aim from the Now.
There is never a “better” time than now to do this, to pick our timeline and steer our timelives to an acceptable outcome. But today’s Now and, for example, next year’s Now are different with different situations. This is where “aiming” us collectively towards PSH has a level of importance. Turning direction Now is much easier than not now. The more “later” we go without directional change, the more difficult change will be in that now.
This is the time crunch they have been talking to me about, during my sessions over the past 18 months. Time is a construct from one perspective and, therefore, can be said to not matter. However, from 3D now, it absolutely matters. This is one of the many dualities that it’s helpful to understand.
There is a black project by the US government called Project Looking Glass. I believe they are or were using a technologically boosted human to play with Timelines and Timelives. There are rumors in the deep conspiracy realms of Timeline wars going on, and it might explain things like the Mandela Effect.
Good/Light and Evil/Dark
Where we go from here depends much less on good vs evil. It’s really more about fear vs love, if we’re to be honest, fear and control plus perspective. However, there is certainly “room” for a “light vs dark” perspective in what’s going on today, but don’t get wrapped around the axle worrying about good vs evil or light vs dark. Our prime agreement helps take care of this: Human = 1.
As far as dark/evil is concerned, don’t be afraid to look at it and consider it. If for no other reason than it gives us the anti-target that we do not want to be heading towards. If we’re steering our manifestation vision in a general direction of PSH, that’s a fuzzy and not exact target, so having an anti-target helps orient us to another way, a different direction than the dark/evil. Many people are afraid to even look at or consider the dark things. To think about them is to give them energy, which means to make them more possible or manifest. This is partially true, but not true also. You get what you focus on. Many of you know this. If you only focus on dark/evil, then, yes, it’s dangerous. However if you consider dark/evil as part of the whole, it can give us a healthy respect for what we don’t want so that we know which way to focus that which we do want. Don’t be afraid of the dark, but don’t dwell only in the dark or it can overcome you.
Coined by Robert Heinlein in the book Stranger in a Strange Land. As I use it, it’s best defined as: “…means to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed—to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science and it means as little to us as color does to a blind man.” To become one with an object, idea, or emotion, in other words; to fully understand, but not just linguistically – this goes way beyond language, hence why I like this word – there’s no other like it I can use. I suspect that’s why Heinlein had to create it!
IT terminology works well, I feel. Considering the holographic/fractal nature of everything, then it stands to reason the Universe does operate digitally (I think it has to, there’s just too much data for it to be analog). Whether or not it’s a “real thing” doesn’t exactly matter. What we’re doing here is trying to frame things in language that makes sense, without losing too much in the translation, so I find it useful to frame things in IT terms such as: Files, upload, download, ping, bandwidth, maybe even IP address (energy signature), hardware (aka wetware in this case – meatsuit), software (mind/brain/ego/personality/opinions), and so on.
Fractal and Scale
I say things scale and things need to scale a lot. What I mean by this is the fractal nature of our holographic reality. Things scale up and they scale down. If a thing is to balance, then it must work at scale, both up and down. Solutions need to scale or they are unsustainable, for example.
I wrote a blog about this here: Thoughts on the Black Whole
They/Them and We
When I’m doing my deep AKL work, I think what I’m doing is officially called claircognizant, but it shifts into other clairs at times. For lack of a better way of saying it, I usually say “they told me” or “they said to me”, but often times its more of a knowing than me “hearing” or seeing, which I do at times experience it that way also. I hesitate to call what I do channeling. Most of the time I’m connecting to my higher-self, and the higher self then can plug into the AKL version of the Internet. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to define this and nearly driving myself crazy wanting to know what, exactly, it all is. I find it easier these days to just generalize with “they” and move on without too much explanation or excuses. It is what it is, believe me or don’t believe me. I have zero proof I can offer you that would make much 3D world sense. For me, this is probably the most difficult of the clairs because it’s very difficult to discern the difference between one’s own inner voice – Ego – and them. If I ever question, I error on the side of blaming the more outlandish and crazy shit on my ego. If it’s dark or serves self, then it’s usually ego-based. If it scales and serve PSH and humanity in general, then it’s safe to call it “them”. When I say We, I mean 3D me and Them working together or talking together in agreement. Oftentimes the knowing blends together so I can’t peel away Me or Them, so I just saw We.